A forum discussion :-
"Would it be correct to assume that the ordinary tangent vector p still
transforms in the usual way? In other words, suppose I'm living in a
2+1 dimensional universe, and there's a point particle with rest mass m
and hence energy-momentum vector in its rest frame of p=m e_0. If I
cross its world line with a certain relative velocity, there's an
element g of SO(2,1) which tells me how to map the particle's tangent
space to my own. Would I measure the particle's energy-momentum to be
p'=gp? (e.g. if I used the particle to do work in my own rest frame)
Would there still be no upper bound on the total energy, i.e. by making
our relative velocity close enough to c, I could measure the particle's
kinetic energy to be as high as I wished?"
5 out of 5
http://www.mathforum.com/kb/message.jspa?messageID=4734121&tstart=0
Showing posts with label forum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forum. Show all posts
Friday, May 28, 2010
Thursday, May 27, 2010
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215) - Greg Egan
Discussion about the Klein's Quartic Curve Application.
4 out of 5
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1109879
4 out of 5
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1109879
White Holes are time-reversed black holes? - Greg Egan
A forum discussion :-
"Hawking radiation is not, and never has been, the "dominant model"
for "powerful emission sources in the universe"."
5 out of 5
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.physics.research/2006-08/msg00250.html
"Hawking radiation is not, and never has been, the "dominant model"
for "powerful emission sources in the universe"."
5 out of 5
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.physics.research/2006-08/msg00250.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)